Another instalment of my Personalities of the Crimean War series, featuring figures by Strelets:
Field Marshal FitzRoy James Henry Somerset, 1st Baron Raglan
The commander-in-chief of the British army in the Crimean War began his army career playing a full part in the Peninsular War. He later served in the Waterloo campaign as aide-de-camp and military secretary to Wellington. The carnage of the battle of Waterloo cost Somerset the amputation of his right arm.
Somerset retained his close association with the Duke of Wellington and, having been promoted to Lieutenant-General during the years of peace after Waterloo, was appointed to command the British army in the Crimean campaign with a brevet rank of full General. In 1852, he was raised to the peerage and became known as the 1st Baron Raglan.
Success at the battles of Alma and Inkerman led to his promotion to Field Marshal, but as the privations of the Crimean winter took its toll on his men, Raglan began to receive criticism in the press, although whether it was entirely fair is debatable.
A poorly executed failed assault on the defences of Sevastopol piled the pressure on the commander and, being weakened by dysentery and a depressive illness, Raglan died whilst still on campaign in June 1855.
Lieutenant General Sir Henry John William Bentinck
With both of Henry Bentinck’s brothers being generals, and his father a Major-General, senior command in the army was virtually a family business. Bentinck began his army service as an ensign in the Coldstream Guards and by 1841, he was an aide-de-camp to Queen Victoria and a brevet colonel.
By the time Bentinck landed in the Crimea with his regiment, he was a Major-General. He took part in the battles of Alma, Balaclava and Inkerman, being badly wounded in the arm in the latter. Despite the wound, he continued to serve in the siege of Sevastopol.
On his return from the Crimea, he was created a K.C.B. and promoted to the rank of General. Bentinck died in 1875.
Lieutenant General Sir Charles Ash Windham
The fourth son of an admiral, as with most of the generals featured in my British personalities series, Windham began his career in a prestigious guards regiment; the Coldstreams. From the rank of Ensign, he went on to purchase a series of promotions throughout the 1830s and 1840s.
After service in Canada, Windham returned to England in 1842 where he remained until the outbreak of the Crimean War. Achieving his colonelcy in June 1854, he was then appointed Assistant Quartermaster General of the 4th Division for the campaign. He soon became renowned for making clear his stern criticism of the poor military leadership of the British army at this time.
At Sevastopol, he was given command of the main British attack on the Great Redan. The result was a failure in which he personally rode back to beg for more reinforcements to continue the assault which had achieved its objective but was ill-equipped to hold it. Windham received criticism from soldiers in his command but was made a popular hero by William Russell, the Times War Correspondent, who declared that Windham’s gallant conduct had saved “the honour of the army”.
Windham’s career continued to be dogged by controversy and mixed opinions as he served in the Indian Mutiny and in Canada until he eventually died while convalescing in Florida in 1870.
*Windham published a detailed diary of his experiences in the Crimean war, which the journalist Russell wrote an introduction to. An online copy is accessible from the Internet Archive here.
Major General James Bucknall Estcourt
The son of an M.P., James Estcourt’s first appointment in the army was as an Ensign in the 44th Regiment. Transferring to the 43rd Regiment, Estcourt served in Gibraltar and later on the Euphrates Valley Expedition. His services on this journey of science and exploration led to his promotion to Lt-Colonel.
Successful service on a boundary commission in Canada and a friendship with Lord Raglan helped Estcourt, now a Brigadier-General, to be appointed Adjutant General for the campaign. However, together with General Airey, he was criticised by a press who considered them both responsible for the winter privations and terrible suffering of the troops.
Stoutly defended by Raglan, Estcourt was appointed Major-General in December 1854, despite the ongoing criticism. Ironically, he fell victim to the same insanitary conditions for which he was being held by some to be responsible and succumbed to cholera in June 1855.
According to the Dictionary of National Biography, his friend and mentor Lord Raglan was “afraid to attend the funeral, for fear of showing his grief; but the last visit he paid before his own death, was to Estcourt’s tomb.”
Major General Sir Henry William Barnard
Sir Henry William Barnard obtained a commission in the 1st Foot Guards in 1814. A newly made Major-General, Barnard landed in the Crimea in 1854, in command of a brigade in the 3rd division of the army, with which he was present during the winter of 1854–5.
Through their figure, Strelets have nicely referenced Roger Fenton’s above photograph of General Barnard posing with a foot on a shell. Whether or not the pose was deliberately made at Fenton’s request, by delicately resting his boot on the shell, the stance nicely suggests something of the violence and danger at the same time as the fragility of the combatants. It’s just one of the postures that Strelets have employed in their Crimean range that is really pleasing to me, painting becomes the act of bringing to life a brief moment from over 150 years ago.
When former chief-of-staff General Simpson succeeded to Commander-in-Chief, Barnard in turn became his chief-of-staff, a position he held at the fall of Sevastopol in September 1855. He later succeeded to the command of the 2nd Division.
In 1857, Barnard took an active command in the Indian Mutiny and won the crucial battle of Badli-ki-Serai but died of cholera on 5 July 1857, eleven weeks before the fall of Delhi to the British.
A wonderful collection again, Love it.
Cheers,
Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheers Pete. I am enjoying tackling these unusual figures.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicely done mate and interesting little tales ,your painting certainly brings these figures to life ! .
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. I’m conscious that the sculptor must have gone through a similar process of research on these officers when choosing who to make. Anyway, I find it an enjoyable process!
LikeLike
And the enjoyment is what we a in it for mate ,and that’s my answer when people ask why do I do it ! .
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only answer that makes sense to me too. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Damn your eyes sir this has just lightened my wallet again ……never looked at these sets, the charm of them is captivating but then sir, thats probably the superb painting!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, very kind of you. I always think that many Strelets figures have that charm to them, but it does take a little careful painting to bring out the best in them, I think.
I say – get spending! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
received my two strelets sets yesterday after my wallet was lightened, love the boxes will pluck up courage to paint a trial figure this Easter and post on Victory V !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent! You’ll note that the boxes come with lots of extra figures to keep you amused. Love to see your interpretation of these figs on Victory V whenever you get time to put paint on them. 🙂 Cheers
Marvin
LikeLike
I have managed to convert a Airfix ‘Maid Marion’ figure into Fanny Duberly can be found here – http://tonystoysoldiers.blogspot.com/search/label/Crimea
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the link. A brilliant idea and really well done too 🙂
LikeLike
What sets are these figures from? Love the British officers uniforms of this period
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Joshua, these are bonus figures from a Strelets set which contained a group of figures released separately but grouped together into big boxes. One was called “Heavy Brigade”
http://www.plasticsoldierreview.com/Review.aspx?id=1259
Also, Lord Raglan is from their set “Into the Valley of Death”
http://www.plasticsoldierreview.com/Review.aspx?id=1203
I did paint more of these British officer figures –
Best wishes
Marvin
LikeLike
Thanks Marvin! Though I’m quite new to this I think I’ll give this one a try, any idea where I can find a set for a decent price?
Thanks and best wishes,
Josh.
LikeLike
Well (I’m assuming you’re in the UK) they used to retail at about £25, occasionally discounted but there doesn’t seem to be too many about any more? I notice that there’s one left on eBay for the Heavy Brigade set for about that price, so that might be your best bet!
LikeLike
Thanks! Will get it next week maybe
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, go for it! Best of luck with the painting. You get lots of heavy cavalry too, so plenty to keep you busy.
Cheers
Marvin
LikeLike
Thanks Marvin, I got the rifle brigade set a while back which I started but never finished, I thought I’d cheat a little and paint a few of them red before realising the rifles wore different tunics! That’s about the extent of my experience painting soldiers, any advice on the best place to get paint for them?
Thanks again and best wishes,
Josh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Josh, I use Vallejo acrylic paint, it’s always very good quality and so seems easier to paint and work with. It’s freely available on eBay and Amazon and other shops.
For rifle regiments, btw, I tend to use Vallejo’s Black Green and highlight with a little Flat Green. For the good old British redcoats, I use Vallejo’s scarlet. I like to add a little watery dark brown wash for shading the red and highlight with the scarlet again.
I bet there are loads of other (and better) approaches out there depending on how you want to paint them but my horse painting tutorials give a fair idea of how I go about painting uniforms too (do a search for four posts called Courses for Horses).
Most of all – have fun with what you’re doing! 🙂
Marvin
LikeLike